Hear Us Now: Comcast Playing Tough With NFL Network -- But Consumers are Still Losing


Now Hear This An open and frank discussion of media and telecommunications issues - from the consumer point of view. Comcast Playing Tough With NFL Network -- But Consumers are Still Losing Posted by Bob at 05/22/07 02:27 PM Share Email Print You may recall the big row that erupted a few months ago between cable companies and the NFL Network. With the playoffs about the begin last December, the NFL Network dialed up the pressure on cable companies to carry its programming as part of their basic cable package. By forcing its way onto basic cable, the NFL Network would be able to claim to reach more viewers and charge higher advertising rates. And that would be in addition to the hefty fees the NFL Network charges the cable companies to carry its programming. Some cable companies refused, arguing that putting the NFL Network on basic cable would be unfair because it would force cable subscribers who have no interest in football to pay for a channel they would never watch. You can read more about the whole sordid affair by clicking here and here. It was against that backdrop that your humble correspondent received a notice in the mail from his cable company Comcast yesterday, which you can read by clicking here. The notice said the NFL Network would no longer be available on my fairly basic cable package -- which is called Digital Plus. From now on the NFL Network will only be available as part of a new "Sports Entertainment Pack," which includes nine other sports channels ranging from Horse Racing TV to the Tennis Channel. We stand by what we said when this standoff first surfaced last December: A pox on both their houses. The only clear loser in this battle from the beginning has been customers, who aren't allowed to choose and pay for only the channels they watch -- a fairly simple concept called channel choice or cable a la carte. We won't be subscribing to the "Sports Entertainment Pack," even if it might mean we won't be able to watch a game or two involving our beloved Washington Redskins. This type of anti-consumer behavior -- by both the NFL Network and cable companies such as Comcast -- should not be encouraged. By the way, we will watching closely to see if Comcast drops the price of the Digital Plus package now that it no longer includes the NFL Network. We're not holding our breath on that one, however. Comments 1 Posted by Walter Fessenden at 06/01/07 05:57 PM Our family would like to have Channel Choice....do not want to pay for trash TV programs. 2 Posted by cedric at 06/26/07 08:30 AM this is not right! comcast is already very high!!i think i will drop HBO, cuz we know that the sopranos sucked!! maybe then i can afford th digital plus package. 3 Posted by John at 06/28/07 12:54 PM Comcasts' dropping the NFL Network is a classic case of bait and switch. It wasn't available on the digital package, so I had to subscribe to the Digital PLUS package. I signed a contract, they broke it and all they can say is "Oh well, that's how it is now". Gee, thank God the FCC is so worried about XM and Sirius merging...why not break up the Comcast monopoly? Post a Comment (* indicates a required field) Name: Email: URL: *Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style) : « You must enter this security code! Remember Me? Yes No				Like what you see? Sign up to receive updates from NOW HEAR THIS every two weeks. Change your email information or unsubscribe. RECENT POSTS Some Shocking Survey Numbers on "Bill Shock" FCC Seeks Solutions for Wireless "Bill Shock" FCC Takes Important First Steps on Several Consumer Issues Internet Consumers Lose Big - Really Big - In Comcast Case Decision Increasing Real Competition Should be Key Goal of National Broadband Plan ARCHIVES July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 USEFUL LINKS About the Writers Guidelines to Blogging CU Action Center Sign up for action alerts RSS Feed BLOG ROLL Abused by the News Agonist ArchPundit Article 19 Axis of Logic Azerbic Back Pages Barlow Friendz Bob Stepno's Other Journalism Weblog Body and Soul BoingBoing Broadcasting and Cable BCBeat Bull Moose Buzz Machine BuzzFlash Center for Creative Voices in Media Clipmonkey Columbia Journalism Review Crooks and Liars Cursor Daily Doubter Daily Howler Daily Kos Dave Barry's Blog DC Media Girl Deadline Pundit Digital Destiny DIYMedia DrewClark Editor and Publisher Editors Weblog Eyeteeth Fair First Draft FishbowlDC Guerilla News Network I Want Media Indy Media Center Instapundit IWTNews Lessig Blog Liberal Oasis Lost Remote Lying Media Bastards Media Citizen Media Geek Media is a Plural Media Nation Media Rights Media Transparency MiniMedia Guy Morning Meeting New Media Musings NewPages News Dissector News Hounds Norman Solomon Off the Kuff Pandagon Political Animal PressThink RConversation Reclaim the Media Romenesko Sascha Meinrath Skookum Stay Free Talking Points Memo Tapped Telecommunications Consulting The Burnt Orange Report The Gadflyer The Huffington Post The Next Hurrah Think Progress TV Tattle TVBarn TVNewser Unsigned Podcast We Want the Airwaves Wirecan Travis Wired in Washington